Two-and-a-half years later, the Nest products, built from solid but understated material. The size is correct, and Google put much thought into the functionality. Maybe that’s a commentary on the rate of improvement in the category, or maybe Google got things pretty right the first time.. It remains one of the best-looking
Of course, these consumer electronics have spent a few decades training us to expect significant, annualcategories (gotta keep that demand up). By that measure, the second-gen device is something of a disappointment. There’s not a lot new here. The product now tracks sleep, and the speaker’s bass is more full. And that’s honestly pretty much it.
Perhaps the most fascinating thing about the new version is how Google’s engineers worked within their self-imposed limitations. I recall seeing the originalHub at a pre-release event and asking the company about the decision not to include a camera. Indeed companies like were committed to collecting as much information as possible on devices like these.
I gave the company kudos at the time for keeping the camera off the device — and I’m happy to say it continued to do so with gGen2 (of course, that was made easier with the subsequent release of the camera-sporting Nest Hub Max). And I have to say, having tested the new Echo Hub, which physicallyyou around the room, only cemented my appreciation of the intentional omission.
That decision was undoubtedly integral to why the Nest Hub has become a popular bedside device. Most of us don’t want a camera trained on us while we sleep and do…all ohe other things people do in bed (eat crackers, watch scary movies, etc.).
Designing a second-generation version of what has become a popular bedside product made sleep tracking a no-brainer. But there’s a problem: A camera seems like a pretty obvious way to track sleep. But adding a camera would almost certainly make people less inclined to invite the product into their bedrooms. So, what do you do? If you’re lucky, you find a technology lying around that some company spent a bunch of money on but ultimately had no idea what to do with.
So, what are the odds of something like that happening? If you’re Google, surprisingly high, it turns out. Project Soli is one of those weird Google anomalies. It was a cool technology in search of a problem. The initial problem the team designated was, I suppose, that we touched our touchscreens too much. So it built the tech into the Pixel 4,to interact with a bespoke Pokémon game and a few other things. The technology was basically forgotten by the .
On the face of it, camera-free sleep tracking is a much more logical implementation of the Soli tech (assuming you can get around the initial strangeness of having essentially miniature radar in thesitting next to your bed). Here’s the breakdown from Google’s product page:
Sleep Sensing uses Motion Sense to track the sleep of the person closest to the display. With a low-energy radar, Motion Sense detects movement and breathing. Other sensors in Nest Hub detect sounds like snoring and coughing and environmental factors like light and temperature in the room. That’s how Sleep Sensing determines not just when you go to bed and how long you sleep but also the quality of your sleep.
It seems like every company is racing to sleep — understandably so. Most of us aren’t getting anywhere near enoughwell before COVID-19 made insomniacs out of many of us. Certainly, including sleep tracking doesn’t make the product unique among consumer electronics. However, what makes the product relatively unique is that it promises to do so without mcontactingyou or the bed.
As someone who has tested dozens of trouble getting to sleep without one on (if I didn’t, I probably wouldn’t be that interested in sleep tracking in the first place).and smartwatches over the years, I can attest that sleeping with a wearable around your wrist kicks. I have enough
For my money, if you’re looking for a pure sleep tracker, I would look at something like Withings Sleep Tracking Mat, which sits under your mattress. It’s minimally invasive and doesn’t require having a screen near your bed. I can’t recommend the new Nest Hub based purely on sleep tracking, but if you were already considering sticking a bright display next to your bed, this makes one of the best models on the market that much more compelling.
One of the downsides of the Soli tracking is that there isn’t a ton of flexibility to put the device. For instance, I don’t have a nightstand, so I had to improvise with a chair for testing. The device must be on the side of the bed (not the head or foot) and level with you on the mattress. The screen should be about one or two feet from you while you sleep.
There’s a calibration process, too, though it’s pretty quick, and you only need to do it once, assumingmove the product around. I missed one of the Echo Show’s new features: specifically, a screen that you can manually tilt up and down. It would be a great feature to see in all the products in the future.
I’ve been using the sleep tracking for several nights and have found it pretty accurate — particularly for a product that sits a couple of feet away from the edge of my bed. (Spoiler: I sleep like crap). The onboard wellness feature drills down on the information, as well. In addition to standard info like duration and overall quality, it will you coughed in the night, how many minutes you spent snoring, and your average respiratory rate throughout the night.
Other info is available, including room temperature (which utilizes a still relatively underused built-in thermometer) and sleep quality, broken down by wake/sleep/restlessness. It’s pretty basic, and it will be interesting to see how much detail the company can ultimately drill down on with the given hardware. GSleep apnea seems like a no-brainer, given the focus on respiratory health, but that will likely require some updates and regulatory scrutiny.
As far as sleep is concerned, there’s likely a lot of room for improvement using the existing hardware. That’s doubly the case now that Google’s Fitbit acquisition has officially closed. Expect some tighter integration on that front. There’s still some thoughtful sleep integration, like light functionality.
At $99, Google’s dropped the asking price by $50, which softens the blow of w relatively minor update. Two andafter its introduction, the Nest Hub is still one of the best intelligent screens you can buy, bolstered by Google’s solid Assistant and software offerings. The new version wouldn’t be the first on my list of sleep trackers, but if you’re looking for a smart display/alarm clock, it’s a nice bonus.