Victoria’s Secret announced a rebrand on Wednesday. Still, plus-size consumers. (Photo: Getty Images) Victoria’s Secret is trying for a rebrand, telling on Wednesday that the lingerie company will do away with its infamous “Angels” to redefine what the brand has long deemed “sexy.”
But with the introduction of the seven women who will make up what the brand is calling the VS Collective, set to spearhead the brand’s transformation, including Megan Rapinoe, Priyanka Chopra Jonas, Valentina Sampaio, and Paloma Elsesser — Victoria’s Secret still missed the mark in catering to the plus-size community, which has historically been left out.
“It goes rightthat happened in 2018, in which Victoria’s Secret’s former executive said, essentially, that people who are transgender and people who are plus size were not welcome in the brand’s narrative and their fantasy,” Gianluca Russo, co-founder of the Power of Plus, tells Yahoo Life. “I think that’s, of course, what sparked all of this, and I think it’s miserable to see them make this , but do not give one comment on whether or not they’re expanding. Sizes.”
Russo points out that the announcement featured in the New York Times wasn’t a surprise to many, as Victoria’s Secret has been quietly altering the appearance of the brand and which represents it by introducing new faces and bodies to itschannels.
The brand was even praised when Elsesser, a size-14 model in Vogue, was featured in a February campaign for Victoria’s Secret new swimwear. And while it seemed hopeful for such a big brand to make even the slightesta more inclusive future, the follow-through appears to fall short.
“They have been trying to pivot slowly without making a huge noise,” Russo says, pointing out that it could have been perceived as a. “It seems as though the only thing they did was put in a few diverse body types, and that’s when they called it a day.”
Any brand will do away with the ethereal identity that it has long been known for as a sacrifice to include larger bodies., who have long been asking that Victoria’s Secret include them in its fantasy, can’t be found within the New York Times feature. Instead, the
“The fact that they are abandoning the fantasy of Victoria’srather than expanding the fantasy fuels this larger narrative where plus is always the other. We can never have the same things; we have to have different things,” Russo explains. “The issue was never that Victoria’s Secret has Victoria’s Secret Angels and they have this show, that was never the issue.
The issue was that this fashion show never reflected the women watching. And so that’s what we wanted. We wanted Angels who remembered us, who recalled an inclusive narrative, but rather — rather than expand that to, to include trans, to include diversity — they said, let’s retire the fantasy and give you something else.”
“Paloma alone does not represent the plus community at large. No one woman can convey an entire spectrum of women that makes up 70 percent of the population, especially as Paloma is on the smaller side of plus. Even within the “new” Victoria’s Secret, the faces meant to represent diversity were cherry-picked from a whole bunch — Elsesser included.
“She fits this fantasy of what the perfect plus is. She fits this palatable version of plus that has this hourglass shape, no double chin, and a flat stomach,” Russo explains. And so she doesn’t accurately represent the women who have been outspokenly pushing Victoria’s Secret to expand and become inclusive.”
As a part of the VS Collective, Elsesser told the Newof her hope that the brand increases its sizing to 5X, adding that she hopes to make “radical change” as a spokesperson and adviser. Still, the brand didn’t provide any comment to confirm that size expansion is a goal. A representative for Victoria’s Secret tells Yahoo Life, “Victoria’s Secret is committed to offering inclusive sizing. Our size range is 30AA to 42DDD (G) and XXS to XXL.“
The brand is expanding, however, to maternity — a category previously not deemed sexy enough to be included in Victoria’s Secret’s catalog. And while featuring a pregnant model in a Mother’s Day campaign last month was a celebrated first, Russo says it’s another source of confusion.
“It shows they can learn to fit for another body type. But why can’t they fit for ours?” he questions. “And I think that is the eternal question here. Why can you work for some women but not all women, especially when the woman you’re leaving out makes up most of the market.”
Russo blames anything tangible and long-lasting,” he says, “and I think that’s the core issue here.”, explaining that the brand can’t correctly reflect those it’s trying to represent without being made up of those same people internally. “You can do all you want on the outside, but if the inside doesn’t change, then we’re not going to get
And while he says that the communities marginalized by companies like Victoria’s Secret have fallen victim to “false promises” of true inclusivity forhopeful for real change, there are still people hoping to get in on this fantasy.
“There are many women who will never shop at Victoria’s Secret because of how. “But I think there are so many more women who will support Victoria’s Secret if they just showed that they cared.” Want lifestyle and wellness news delivered to your inbox? Sign up here for Yahoo Life’s newsletter.